Comments on: Intel Delays “Sapphire Rapids” Server Chips, Confirms HBM Memory Option https://www.nextplatform.com/2021/06/29/intel-delays-sapphire-rapids-server-chips-confirms-hbm-memory-option/ In-depth coverage of high-end computing at large enterprises, supercomputing centers, hyperscale data centers, and public clouds. Thu, 30 Mar 2023 23:11:52 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 By: Timothy Prickett Morgan https://www.nextplatform.com/2021/06/29/intel-delays-sapphire-rapids-server-chips-confirms-hbm-memory-option/#comment-164167 Tue, 29 Jun 2021 21:05:27 +0000 https://www.nextplatform.com/?p=138732#comment-164167 In reply to JayN.

I think Intel has said it was designed so it

    could

do it, but I do not believe the plan from the beginning was that it

    would

do it.

]]> By: Brazil Guy https://www.nextplatform.com/2021/06/29/intel-delays-sapphire-rapids-server-chips-confirms-hbm-memory-option/#comment-164166 Tue, 29 Jun 2021 21:00:17 +0000 https://www.nextplatform.com/?p=138732#comment-164166 O monstro tá saindo da jaula… Exaflop boyyy…

]]> By: JayN https://www.nextplatform.com/2021/06/29/intel-delays-sapphire-rapids-server-chips-confirms-hbm-memory-option/#comment-164163 Tue, 29 Jun 2021 18:46:12 +0000 https://www.nextplatform.com/?p=138732#comment-164163 “Intel revised the Ponte Vecchio plan to use a mix of chiplets etched in its own foundries as well as those of its competitors”

Raja stated that Ponte Vecchio was designed from the start to use a mix of chiplets from internal and external foundries.

]]>